We represent the interests of private entities in litigation with public authorities. Thus, two main areas of our practice are cases of administrative proceedings and cases concerning the protection of property rights.
It is not always possible to achieve the restoration of violated rights at the national level, and then the only opportunity to restore justice is to appeal to the European Court.
The great experience allows us to ensure the effective representation of the client’s interests starting from the assessment of the perspectives of applying to the European Court to the full enforcement of the decision made in client’s favour.
In the section criminal law on the main page and in the section «Practice»
Most people who are faced with law enforcement agencies for the first time believe that the innocent person has nothing to hide, and therefore he or she does not need legal aid. However, criminal proceedings are a parallel reality, in which generally accepted logic does not apply. No matter what those or other events in the real world are, it matters only if they can be used against you.
The opinion that according to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Lazarenko and others v. Ukraine (application no. 70329/12 and 5 others, judgment of 27.06.2017) court summons should be sent only as registered correspondence is actively disseminated in the professional Internet communities.
Protocols Nos. 15 and 16 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms were opened for signature in 2013 with a several months of difference. Protocols were designed to reduce the burden on the European Court of Human Rights and, accordingly, increase its effectiveness.
Is it possible to try or punish twice? What is the practice of the European Court of Human Rights on this issue? Answering these questions, the Court has prepared a Handbook on Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights based on the Court’s decisions up to August 2017.